Dear Texas Supreme Court Justices:
I'm sure you tire quickly of all the times people have picked on you lately, what with all the sucking up to campaign contributors you tend to do in your official opinions, and accusations of some of you burning down your own houses and all.
So to cheer you up, I thought I'd point out what other state's courts are sometimes faced with.
But mostly, I just thought some of you might have awakened this morning thinking, "wow, I really wish I could find out the details of whatever happened to the New Mexico guy who changed his name from "Snaphappy Fishsuit Mokiligon" to "Variable," (and who among us hasn't awakened thinking that at one time or another?), this website to the rescue.
Hint: apparently, the New Mexico court system has noted for the record that The Artist Formerly Known as Snaphappy has gone too far this time.
And, of course, if you instead woke up this morning thinking about something entirely different, please disregard this important news update.
Subscribe via RSS
7 comments:
Ummm ... none of the above? I only get mad about really important things, like which wine opener to use -- Why WOULDN'T you use the rabbit? It's quick, it's efficient, it never breaks a cork -- I mean, really!
Oops. This was supposed to be on the "Weekly Poll" post. It makes absolutely no sense here. Unless the makers of the Rabbit have sued non-users. Then it makes sense. Sort of, maybe.
seriously...we have more pressing matters: the good news is that stephen baldwin will be leaving the country; the bad news is he announced this in austin? who the f*** let him in?http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/01/stephen-baldwin-on-fox-ne_n_110169.html
DMw/P - in my limited, yet educational experience, makers of the rabit SHOULD sue all non-users. Oh wait, you're talking about the wine opener??! Well, that too. But nevermind.
Anonymous (if indeed that is your real name) - we ALWAYS have more pressing matters. But that brings us back to the rabbit.
What really makes me mad is the $8 million taken from TANF to go to these marriage classes. That's some sweet gig for "marriage teachers" (wonder what their credentials will need to be?) and its money taken from needy children...
Wow, almost everybody posting on this entry posted to the wrong entry. They either meant to comment about the one after it or before it. I'm not sure whether that's more of a commentary on the ease of navigating this site, or the IQ of the readers. :)
It probably has less to do with our IQ that it does our state of inebriation.
Post a Comment