If you absolutely cannot resist calling somebody a "lying cheating son of a (expletive), sneaky back door (expletive) nut (expletive) sucker," at least have enough sense to not put it in an email.
This episode of Friendly Advice to Public Officials has been brought to you by Letters From Texas Worldwide Headquarters, Rocket Science Division.
Interesting doings in the Texas Senate yesterday.
Among the Senate's duties is the confirmation of the Governor's appointments to various state boards and commissions. In other words, these appointees run state government.
Yesterday, the nomination of Dr. Bryan Shaw came up, to continue as one of three commissioners over the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
Most of the Senate Democrats opposed the confirmation, based on the silly notion that the state agency charged with protecting the environment should...well, you know...do a little of that from time to time.
During the course of that debate, Republican Senator Mike Jackson, who chairs the Senate Nominations Committee, the first stop for all these appointees, remarked in defense of Dr. Shaw that the Senate needs to look beyond policy differences, and instead cast their votes based on a particular appointee's qualifications, experience, and expertise.
Fair enough, Chairman Jackson. Let's talk about Shanda Perkins. Ms. Perkins is pending in Jackson's Nominations Committee, as a Perry appointee to the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles. Her committee hearing is today.
What are Shanda Perkins' qualifications? Well, she led a revolt against sex toys.
Her holy quest to rid Planet Earth of the scourge of people doing whatever they want in the privacy of their own homes landed one woman in jail, and the whole mess ended up in Federal Court. The courts eventually ruled that Ms. Perkins' goal, and the law that goes with it, is unconstitutionally illegal.
Perkins' only other qualification for appointment by Perry seems to be that she was caught passing out anonymous fliers attacking Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison at Republican events.
So what's it gonna be, Mr. Chairman? Is the talent bar in Texas so low these days that we're going to entrust decisions, regarding who remains in prison and who is set free, to a political hack anti sex toy crusader who is unconcerned with the U.S. Constitution?
The appointment is an embarrassment. Jus' sayin'.
Folks inside the Capitol and out began grumbling in earnest yesterday afternoon about the increasing rotting stench of dead bills in the House. Here it is Tuesday morning, and they'll start 4 pages from the end of last Saturday's calendar. The House worked Saturday for a while, but then unexpectedly adjourned early because of a rumored very important conflict with the Speaker's schedule. The House again adjourned early yesterday, to the surprise of the 149 members whose names don't start with a "J" and end with an "oe Straus."
Meanwhile, the tongues of those not whining about the increasingly-apparent deadness of deader than dead bills were contemplating that little DPS oopsie. Inquiring minds want to know the deets!
Do you have an unsubstantiated rumor? Leave it in the comments section. We're not that picky about accuracy. Come on - you know you wanna.
Sunday morning, I joined KXAN's Jenny Hoff, Statesman reporter Jason Embry, and Republican consultant Ted Delisi, for "Session '09: In Depth." The political roundtable segment is clearly a desperate attempt to put a little content in between the TV ads advocated for or against various candidates for Austin mayor and city council.
If you absolutely cannot resist calling somebody a "lying cheating son of a (expletive), sneaky back door (expletive) nut (expletive) sucker," at least have enough sense to not put it in an email.
This episode of Friendly Advice to Public Officials has been brought to you by Letters From Texas Worldwide Headquarters, Rocket Science Division.
Interesting doings in the Texas Senate yesterday.
Among the Senate's duties is the confirmation of the Governor's appointments to various state boards and commissions. In other words, these appointees run state government.
Yesterday, the nomination of Dr. Bryan Shaw came up, to continue as one of three commissioners over the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
Most of the Senate Democrats opposed the confirmation, based on the silly notion that the state agency charged with protecting the environment should...well, you know...do a little of that from time to time.
During the course of that debate, Republican Senator Mike Jackson, who chairs the Senate Nominations Committee, the first stop for all these appointees, remarked in defense of Dr. Shaw that the Senate needs to look beyond policy differences, and instead cast their votes based on a particular appointee's qualifications, experience, and expertise.
Fair enough, Chairman Jackson. Let's talk about Shanda Perkins. Ms. Perkins is pending in Jackson's Nominations Committee, as a Perry appointee to the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles. Her committee hearing is today.
What are Shanda Perkins' qualifications? Well, she led a revolt against sex toys.
Her holy quest to rid Planet Earth of the scourge of people doing whatever they want in the privacy of their own homes landed one woman in jail, and the whole mess ended up in Federal Court. The courts eventually ruled that Ms. Perkins' goal, and the law that goes with it, is unconstitutionally illegal.
Perkins' only other qualification for appointment by Perry seems to be that she was caught passing out anonymous fliers attacking Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison at Republican events.
So what's it gonna be, Mr. Chairman? Is the talent bar in Texas so low these days that we're going to entrust decisions, regarding who remains in prison and who is set free, to a political hack anti sex toy crusader who is unconcerned with the U.S. Constitution?
The appointment is an embarrassment. Jus' sayin'.
Folks inside the Capitol and out began grumbling in earnest yesterday afternoon about the increasing rotting stench of dead bills in the House. Here it is Tuesday morning, and they'll start 4 pages from the end of last Saturday's calendar. The House worked Saturday for a while, but then unexpectedly adjourned early because of a rumored very important conflict with the Speaker's schedule. The House again adjourned early yesterday, to the surprise of the 149 members whose names don't start with a "J" and end with an "oe Straus."
Meanwhile, the tongues of those not whining about the increasingly-apparent deadness of deader than dead bills were contemplating that little DPS oopsie. Inquiring minds want to know the deets!
Do you have an unsubstantiated rumor? Leave it in the comments section. We're not that picky about accuracy. Come on - you know you wanna.
Sunday morning, I joined KXAN's Jenny Hoff, Statesman reporter Jason Embry, and Republican consultant Ted Delisi, for "Session '09: In Depth." The political roundtable segment is clearly a desperate attempt to put a little content in between the TV ads advocated for or against various candidates for Austin mayor and city council.
Blogger Template Spain courtesy of Ourblogtemplates.com. Header artwork courtesy of Doug Zabel.
Back to TOP
Subscribe via RSS
